LLM Output Handling Needs No New Controls
Insecure output handling mitigations, layer by layer. Every LLM attack in this track dies to a control invented before LLMs, and the sandbox moves least.
I'm Bikramjeet Singh, a Lead Penetration Tester. Every engagement teaches something the courses skip over, so I write those bits down in full, web, API, Active Directory, cloud, Kubernetes and AI, including the attempts that went nowhere. No theory, no vendor filler, no "it depends".
Everything I publish lands on one of these. The count is the honest depth, not a target.
Cluster security learned in public, start to finish. The series is complete.
Attacking and securing AI systems and the plumbing around them.
Fresh CVEs pulled apart to root cause, not "patch now".
App and API testing, auth flaws and business logic abuse.
Active Directory, lateral movement, privilege paths.
Coming soonIAM, storage exposure and config reviews that matter.
Coming soonKiosk escapes, restricted shells, thick client, mobile.
Coming soonWPA handshakes, evil twin, deauth, Bluetooth and RFID.
Coming soonNewest first. Each one starts with something I did not understand, works through what actually happens under the hood, and ends with what it means for security. The wrong turns stay in.
Insecure output handling mitigations, layer by layer. Every LLM attack in this track dies to a control invented before LLMs, and the sandbox moves least.
A short reference on LLM hallucinations: the three types, the measured rates by model, and the checks to run before you install a package a model suggested.
CVE-2026-81578 and CVE-2026-82078 chain to pre-auth RCE in PaperCut NG and MF, exploited as a zero-day. Why the auth check ran, passed, and still missed.
LLM data exfiltration needs no script and no click. A markdown image is a silent outbound GET, and my own password reached my server in the query string.
Every line below is a link to something already on this site. No roadmap, no coming soon, just what is published and how much of it there is.
A complete series: a cluster built, broken and rebuilt across 42 topics, from RBAC and admission control through to runtime.
How the models actually work, then how they fail, from neural network internals to attacking LLM apps.
Command-level operator playbooks: 185 AI / LLMs, 140 Kubernetes, 26 Web & API. The bits you reach for mid-engagement.
CVE teardowns taken to root cause rather than "patch now and hope".
Started the Kubernetes track in the open and kept going for 42 topics. The counts move because I publish, not because I planned a number.
New write-up most days. Labs, dead ends and the odd working exploit. Compare notes, argue with me, or just come along for the ride.